How to Specify Aluminum Windows for Commercial Projects: An Architect's Checklist
Why Window Specifications Matter More Than Most Architects Expect
Aluminum windows are specified on virtually every commercial project, yet they are routinely under-specified. A vague call-out like "commercial aluminum windows, thermally broken" leaves a contractor free to install a product that meets the letter of the specification while falling well short of what the building actually demands. Leaks, excessive air infiltration, deflection failures, and early hardware wear are the predictable results.
The good news: the fenestration industry has developed a rigorous, well-documented performance framework. The AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 (NAFS) standard — published by the Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) — gives specifiers a precise, testable language for window performance. This checklist walks through every major specification decision, from selecting the right performance class to writing the submittal requirements that protect your design intent.
Use this guide alongside your Division 08 specification section. And when you're ready to source aluminum window systems built to these standards, explore the TWD product range.
Step 1: Determine the Required NAFS Performance Class
The NAFS standard defines four performance classes for windows. Each class corresponds to a typical building type and imposes increasingly stringent minimum requirements for structural load resistance, water penetration resistance, air infiltration, and (for the highest class) lifecycle durability testing.
Selecting the wrong class is the most consequential specification error you can make. Class is not interchangeable with grade — a high Performance Grade (PG) product in a lower class is not the same as a lower-PG product in a higher class. The classes impose different test protocols, different deflection limits, and different auxiliary test requirements.
NAFS Performance Class Summary
| Class | Full Name | Typical Application | Min. PG (psf) | Min. Structural Test Pressure | Min. Water Resistance Test Pressure | Lifecycle Test Required? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | Residential | One- and two-family dwellings | PG 15 (15 psf) | 22.5 psf | 2.90 psf | No |
| LC | Light Commercial | Low-rise multifamily, light commercial | PG 25 (25 psf) | 37.5 psf | 4.41 psf | No |
| CW | Commercial Window | Low- to mid-rise commercial, offices, hospitals | PG 30 (30 psf) | 45 psf | 4.50 psf | No |
| AW | Architectural Window | Mid- to high-rise, extreme use, landmark projects | PG 40 (40 psf) | 60 psf | 8.00 psf | Yes (per AAMA 910) |
Source: RDH Building Science — Performance Class: The Key Concept at the Heart of NAFS
For most low- to mid-rise commercial work — offices, retail, schools, medical facilities — CW class is the appropriate baseline. AW class is required for high-rise curtain wall applications and any project where the window will experience frequent, heavy operation over a long service life. Critically, AW class products are only available in aluminum, because the qualification criteria are too demanding for any other frame material to meet.
Checklist action: Confirm the building height, use type, and exposure before selecting a class. For projects over six stories, default to AW. For anything in hurricane-prone or high-wind regions, engage a structural engineer early.
Step 2: Establish the Required Performance Grade (PG)
Once you have selected a performance class, you need to determine the minimum Performance Grade. The PG is a single numeric value (in psf or Pa) derived from the wind load your building must resist. It is not simply a marketing tier — it is a tested structural rating.
The Performance Grade represents the Design Pressure at which all NAFS performance requirements are simultaneously met: structural integrity at 1.0x DP, structural safety at 1.5x DP, and water resistance at 15–20% of DP (capped at 580 Pa / 12 psf for US projects). A window that passes the structural test at PG 50 but fails the water test at PG 40 is rated PG 40 — the lower of the two governs.
How to Determine the Required PG
- Obtain the design wind pressure from your structural engineer, calculated per ASCE 7 using the building's exposure category, roof height, and basic wind speed for the site.
- Convert design pressure to PG. PG values are expressed in increments of 5 psf (240 Pa). Round up to the next increment above your calculated design pressure.
- Verify the test specimen size. A window qualifies all sizes smaller than the tested specimen. If your project requires large fixed units or wide operable sashes, confirm that the test size the manufacturer used is equal to or larger than what you need.
- Apply the result to your specification. Write the product designation in the NAFS format: Class – PG – Max. Size Tested – Product Type. For example: CW-PG40-63×63-Type FX.
Checklist action: Never let a contractor substitute a product with a higher PG in a lower class. A CW-PG50 product has not met the lifecycle test or deflection limits of an AW-PG40 product.
Step 3: Specify Air Infiltration Requirements
Air leakage through windows drives energy consumption and occupant discomfort. NAFS defines air performance in two categories:
- Fixed (non-operable) windows: No operable sash means no moving joints, so air infiltration requirements are minimal. Specify a fixed air leakage limit per ASTM E283.
- Operable windows: Tested per ASTM E283 at a standard pressure of 1.57 psf (75 Pa). NAFS uses air class designations A1, A2, and A3, where A3 is the most airtight.
For commercial projects, require A3 air infiltration class for all operable units. This corresponds to a maximum air leakage of 0.1 cfm/ft² of window area at 1.57 psf — the most stringent rating in the NAFS system. Some projects in mild climates may accept A2, but A3 is the defensible default for any conditioned commercial space.
In addition to NAFS air class, the traditional AAMA specification often calls for a maximum of 0.30 cfm per linear foot of operable sash crack, tested per ASTM E283. Both metrics should appear in your specification to satisfy different plan review authorities.
Checklist action: Include both the NAFS air class designation and the cfm/ft² limit. Require pre- and post-lifecycle air leakage testing for AW class products (AAMA 910).
Step 4: Specify Water Penetration Resistance
Water penetration failures are the most visible and costly window performance defect. NAFS ties water resistance directly to Performance Grade — the minimum test pressure is 15% of the Design Pressure for CW and AW class products (20% for R and LC), capped at 12 psf (580 Pa) for US projects.
For a CW-PG40 window, the minimum water resistance test pressure is 6.0 psf. For an AW-PG40 window, it is 8.0 psf. High-rise commercial products may be specified at water test pressures of 10.0 psf or higher depending on regional driving rain exposure.
The governing test methods are:
- ASTM E331 — Static pressure water penetration test (laboratory)
- ASTM E547 — Cyclic pressure water penetration test (laboratory)
- ASTM E1105 — Field determination of water penetration (post-installation)
Require field water testing per ASTM E1105 on a percentage of installed windows — typically 10% of each window type or as directed by the envelope consultant. This gives you a contractual mechanism to catch installation failures before the project closes out.
Checklist action: Write both the minimum water resistance test pressure (in psf) and the ASTM test method in Part 2 of your specification. Add ASTM E1105 field testing as a Quality Control requirement in Part 3.
Step 5: Address Structural Performance and Deflection Limits
NAFS requires structural testing per ASTM E330 at 1.0x Design Pressure (Uniform Load Deflection Test) and 1.5x Design Pressure (Uniform Load Structural Test). No permanent deformation is permitted at 1.5x DP; the window must return to normal operation after the test.
Deflection limits differentiate the higher performance classes from the lower ones. For CW and AW class products, the maximum allowable deflection of any framing member is L/175 of the unsupported span when tested at Design Pressure. This is a significantly tighter requirement than many residential-grade products can meet, and it matters: excessive deflection at mullions and sill members allows glass to rock in glazing pockets, compromising the seal and accelerating failure.
For projects in hurricane-prone regions (ASCE 7 Wind Zone III or IV), your structural engineer may also require large-missile impact testing per ASTM E1886 / E1996. This is a separate requirement from NAFS structural performance and must be called out explicitly. Some jurisdictions, such as Florida, require passive impact protection (laminated glass) rather than storm shutters for all commercial glazing.
Checklist action: Confirm the L/175 deflection limit is explicitly stated. For coastal and hurricane-zone projects, add large-missile impact testing requirements and coordinate with the glazing specification (Division 08 80 00).
Step 6: Specify Finishes and Corrosion Resistance
Aluminum is naturally corrosion-resistant, but the finish determines long-term performance in aggressive environments. AAMA publishes three voluntary performance standards for factory-applied finishes on aluminum fenestration:
- AAMA 2603 — Organic coatings (polyester powder coat). Minimum performance; suitable for interior or protected applications only.
- AAMA 2604 — High-performance organic coatings (50% PVDF resin minimum). Suitable for most commercial exterior applications. Specifies 5-year chalk/fade resistance.
- AAMA 2605 — Superior-performing organic coatings (70% PVDF resin minimum). Required for coastal, high-UV, and high-pollution environments. Specifies 10-year chalk/fade resistance and superior film adhesion.
For any exterior commercial aluminum window within 1,500 feet of saltwater or in a high-humidity industrial environment, specify AAMA 2605 as the minimum finish standard. In all other commercial applications, AAMA 2604 is the appropriate default.
For anodized finishes, reference AAMA 611 (Class I anodize, 0.7 mil minimum) for exterior applications and AAMA 612 (Class II, 0.4 mil minimum) for interior.
Checklist action: Specify the finish standard by AAMA number, not by generic descriptor. Require color chips and finish samples as submittals for architect's review.
Step 7: Thermal Performance Requirements
Energy codes in most US jurisdictions reference NFRC-rated window values. The key metrics for commercial aluminum windows are:
- U-factor: Overall thermal transmittance. Lower is better. Most commercial energy codes require U ≤ 0.45 for vertical glazing; climate zones 4–8 may require U ≤ 0.38 or lower.
- Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC): Fraction of solar radiation admitted through the window. Specify based on building orientation, climate zone, and the mechanical engineer's energy model.
- Visible Light Transmittance (VT): Relevant for daylighting-focused designs.
Thermally broken aluminum frames — using polyamide struts or poured-and-debridged polyurethane barriers to separate interior and exterior aluminum — are mandatory for compliant performance in virtually all commercial climate zones. Specify the thermal barrier system by reference to AAMA TIR-A14 (Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems) to ensure the barrier contributes structurally, not just thermally.
Checklist action: Require NFRC-certified U-factor and SHGC values as submittals. Coordinate with the mechanical engineer's energy compliance documentation (COMcheck or energy model).
Step 8: Submittal Requirements and Quality Assurance
A well-written specification is only as good as its submittal and testing requirements. Include the following in Part 1 of your Division 08 52 13 (Aluminum Windows) section:
Required Submittals
- NAFS product designation label (class, PG, test size, product type)
- Independent laboratory test reports for structural, air, and water performance (ASTM E330, E283, E331/E547)
- AAMA 910 lifecycle test report (AW class only)
- NFRC-certified product data sheet (U-factor, SHGC, VT)
- Shop drawings showing frame sections, anchor conditions, glazing pocket dimensions, and weep path details
- Finish samples and manufacturer's finish certification (AAMA 2604 or 2605)
- Structural engineer's letter of compliance confirming window system meets project design pressure
- Installation instructions and manufacturer's warranty
Quality Assurance
- Require a pre-installation conference with the window installer, glazing subcontractor, and waterproofing subcontractor present
- Install and inspect a minimum one mock-up unit before production installation begins
- Conduct field water testing per ASTM E1105 on completed installations
- Require the installer to hold a current AAMA Fenestration Installer Certification or equivalent
Checklist action: Do not accept manufacturer's self-certification as a substitute for independent laboratory test reports. The test report must identify the exact product configuration tested, including frame depth, glazing infill, and hardware.
Your Complete Specification Checklist at a Glance
| Specification Item | Minimum Requirement (Commercial) | Reference Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Class | CW (low-/mid-rise); AW (high-rise) | AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 |
| Performance Grade (PG) | Determined by ASCE 7 wind load analysis | ASCE 7; NAFS |
| Structural test pressure | 1.5x Design Pressure per ASTM E330 | ASTM E330 |
| Deflection limit | L/175 of unsupported span at DP | NAFS; AAMA 101 |
| Air infiltration (operable) | NAFS Class A3 (≤ 0.1 cfm/ft²) | ASTM E283; NAFS |
| Water penetration resistance | 15–20% of DP (min. 6 psf for CW-PG40) | ASTM E331 / E547 |
| Field water testing | 10% of each window type post-install | ASTM E1105 |
| Exterior finish (standard) | AAMA 2604 (70% PVDF for coastal: 2605) | AAMA 2604 / 2605 |
| Thermal barrier | Structural polyamide or PU, per AAMA TIR-A14 | AAMA TIR-A14 |
| U-factor | Per applicable energy code (typically ≤ 0.45) | NFRC; ASHRAE 90.1 |
| Lifecycle test (AW class) | Required | AAMA 910 |
| Impact resistance (hurricane zones) | Large-missile impact per ASTM E1886/E1996 | ASTM E1886 / E1996 |
Common Specification Mistakes to Avoid
1. Specifying PG Without Specifying Class
A Performance Grade without a Performance Class is meaningless. PG 40 in R class is an entirely different product from PG 40 in AW class. Always write both.
2. Confusing Design Pressure With Structural Test Pressure
The structural test pressure is 150% of the Design Pressure for windows. A window specified at PG 40 (DP = 40 psf) must be tested at 60 psf. Do not write a specification that calls for structural test pressure equal to Design Pressure — you will get a non-compliant product.
3. Accepting Substitutions Without Re-Testing Data
If a contractor proposes a substitute window product, require independent test data for the substitute in the same configuration (size, glazing, hardware) as the specified product. Test results for a different product line — even from the same manufacturer — do not transfer.
4. Omitting Installation Requirements
A window can pass every laboratory test and still fail in service due to improper installation. Anchor spacing, sill flashing details, and the transition between the window frame and the air/water barrier are the most common failure points. Require the window manufacturer's installation instructions as a submittal and hold the installer accountable to them.
Work With a Supplier Who Speaks the Language
Specifying to AAMA and NAFS standards is only useful if your supply chain can deliver products that actually meet those standards. Ask manufacturers for complete NAFS product designation labels, third-party test reports from AAMA-accredited laboratories, and clear documentation of which sizes are covered by each test report.
TWD manufactures aluminum window systems designed specifically for commercial and architectural applications. Our products are specified to the performance classes and grades that commercial projects demand. Browse the full TWD product range or contact our specification team to discuss your project requirements. We can provide project-specific performance data, sample submittals, and technical support from design through closeout.




